According to our Special Topics analysis of photonic
crystals research over the past decade, the work of Prof.
Dr. Willem Vos ranks at #11 by total cites, with 24 papers
cited a total of 1,585 times. He is a coauthor of the
top-ranked paper on the list of 20 most-cited papers over
the past 10 years. Three of his papers have been recognized
as Highly Cited Papers in their field by
Essential Science IndicatorsSM from
Reuters. The Web of Science®lists 48 original papers authored or co-authored by
Prof. Dr. Vos cited a total of 2,511 times from
Currently, Prof. Dr. Vos is Group Leader in the Center for
Nanophotonics at the FOM-Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics AMOLF
in Amsterdam, and Professor on the chair "Complex Photonic Systems" (COPS)
at the Department of Science and Technology and the MESA+ Institute for
Nanotechnology at the University of Twente, the Netherlands.
In the interview
below, ScienceWatch.com correspondent Gary Taubes
talks with Prof. Dr. Vos about his photonic crystals
What factors or circumstances led you to your
highly cited 1998 Science paper, "Preparation of photonic
crystals made in air spheres in titania," (Wijnhoven JEGJ and Vos WL,
281: 802-4, 7 August 1998)?
After I started to work on photonic crystals in 1993 in the group of Prof.
Ad Lagendijk and Dr. Rudolf Sprik, when it was a very young field, I first
made them from colloidal nanoparticles. A photonic crystal is like a
crystal of atoms, for instance—but magnified 10,000 times. The nice
thing about colloidal crystals is they have just the right length scales
for these photonic crystals. You can make really big crystals, fairly
easily; you don’t need any complicated fabrication infrastructure.
The downside, though, is that photonic crystals require a high refractive
index contrast. What that means is this: a photonic crystal is a structure
made of two different materials and they are interspersed in a regular
fashion with typical length scales comparable to the wavelength of light.
An important property of these two materials is that they should have as
different as possible a refractive index—that tells you how fast the
speed of light is in a material.
"With these crystals, you can really
drastically change how light is
By using materials with different refractive indices, you achieve strong
scattering, and light will be strongly perturbed in that material, which is
exactly what you want. So these colloidal crystals had an insufficient
refractive index contrast. The contrast was too small for what we wanted to
do. I was thinking of how we could increase the difference.
So how did you go about increasing the refractive
Well, we had also made a kind of photonic crystal called an opal. This is
like a stack of spheres, in which the nanoparticles are the spheres,
stacked like canon balls, or oranges in the supermarket. And there’s
space between these spheres. The problem with this opal, though, is that it
still had an insufficient refractive index contrast.
Then I was inspired by some work in which researchers had filled the space
between spheres with another material. I thought that you could use this
technique to infiltrate the space between the spheres with a material that
has a high refractive index. That was the first step. The second step was
the realization that we could then remove the original spheres from the
opal. What you have achieved is called an inverse opal that consists of
hollow spheres or air spheres, which is what we call them, now sitting in
this high-index material. Now you have a photonic crystal with a very high
Is this structure called an opal because it has the
same structure as the opal you would buy in a jewelry store?
Yes. What you buy at a jewelry store is pretty similar to what we make. It
has nice colors, which are interference colors from this ordered structure.
Why did you choose titanium dioxide for the
We chose it because we knew it has a high refractive index and it’s
also transparent for many wavelengths of light. You have to make a
compromise here: if you chose a high-index material, the price you pay is
that you have to use materials that tend not to be transparent. I wanted a
material that was transparent in the visible spectrum, and titanium dioxide
has about the highest-index out there. It was also fairly easy to make. For
your information, titanium dioxide is also the stuff that makes paper and
Were you surprised at the results?
In a way, no, and in a way, yes. No, because I was indeed hoping for these
results. Yes, because we first tried this with silica, which is silicon
dioxide (the stuff in glass), and that didn’t work at all. We tried
that first because we thought it might be easier to do, and we were already
working with silica. It didn’t work. Then we said, "OK, if this
isn’t working, let’s try the other one—titanium
dioxide—and hope for the best." And it worked right from the start.
What, in your view, is the significance of this
paper for the field? Why do you think it’s garnered such a
remarkable number of citations?
Okay, this is, of course, guessing, but here goes. My guess is that we
described how to make photonic crystals like these inverse air spheres, and
then we also did optical experiments on them. We made a crystal much better
than all the previous ones and showed that it was easy to make. You
didn’t need any involved clean-room methods or chemistry. You could
basically make it in your own kitchen.
What’s interesting, though, is that at the same time we published our
paper, a similar paper was published by a group of chemists. But they
didn’t do the optical experiments that we did. We showed in our paper
what such a sample looks like, and optical spectra. You could really see
that it works. You could see this colorful luster. That’s one of the
reasons it’s been so popular and that was an advantage we had over
the other paper. They didn’t realize the optics connotations of these
crystals; they only showed electron microscope pictures.
What are the technological applications for inverse
sphere photonic crystals?
With these crystals, you can really drastically change how light is
behaving. So the obvious applications are optics. After we published our
Science paper, we showed you could put light sources inside these
inverse opal crystals. We demonstrated that the crystals can make these
light sources more efficient, or you can choose conditions that get them to
emit less light. That’s good if you want to collect light. You want
it so that it does not reradiate away as light. Also, the type of crystals
we described can probably be spray painted on surfaces. You can make
coatings from them.
I should also add that the group of chemists who published their paper at
the same time as we did wanted to make catalysts from these air spheres.
That’s an application that we hadn’t considered. So you can
probably combine chemistry with optics to make materials that react in
specified ways under the influence of light.
How has the field of photonic crystals and your own
research evolved in the last decade since you published the
I think our 1998 paper was influential in creating the big interest in this
field. We made it easy to make interesting photonic crystals, and many
people started doing it. So the inverse opals created an explosion of
research that probably lasted until 2003.
"…science is useful in the
long term, but it’s also fun in the
By that point, people had developed so many different inverse opals for so
many different purposes that they shifted to doing the kinds of optical
experiments necessary to study and measure the various phenomena predicted.
Now there is much more of a push toward functional photonic crystals that
will be useful different in applications.
Can you give us an example?
One example would be similar to what I already mentioned. You put a light
source inside your crystal and make the emission stronger or more
directional. So you improve the efficiency of your light source. Another
one would be switching photonic crystals with a short laser pulse to make a
very fast optical switch.
What have you been working on for the past few
We've been focusing more and more on how to make cavities inside photonic
crystals. The cavities are important for making these crystals functional.
The reason why photonic crystals were invented in 1987 was that you could
really trap light in these three-dimensional cages.
We’ve also been working a lot lately on
quantum dots, which are an important kind of light
source that you can then put inside photonic crystals. And we are
working a lot on using photonic crystals and cavities as optical
Which of your professional achievements brings you
the most satisfaction?
I suppose that’s the work in which we were first to control the
emission of light sources by using these photonic crystals. We published
that in Nature in 2004 (Lodahl P, et al., "Controlling
the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quantum dots by photonic
crystals," 430: 654-7, 5 August 2004) and that was the culmination of
a lot of work, including the original work on these inverse opals. You can
think of the Science paper as the infrastructure that we needed to
do the 2004 experiment.
Why did it take six years to go from the
infrastructure to the culmination of the work?
In hindsight, you can always think that some period of time was too long.
But when you’re doing it, you’re just finding out all the
things you don’t know at that very moment. For instance, one thing
that we bumped into is that we first chose the wrong kind of light source
to do the experiment. The first kind of light source we used basically died
within the crystal. Then we chose a different light source (quantum dots),
one that was much more stable, and we were able to demonstrate both this
enhancement effect and inhibited emission.
What would you like to convey to the general public
about your work?
Well, quite often people ask scientists, "OK, that’s nice what
you’ve done, but what is it good for? Why should I be interested?"
Since, realistically speaking, applications might typically be 10 or 20
years in the future, it does not impress Joe Sixpack. But you can also
compare doing research to a Formula One car race. You can ask,
"What’s the use of a Formula One race," and the answer is not much
and it wastes a lot of gas. Maybe they'll develop some new technology that
they test in these races, but it’s unlikely to be something
I’ll have at home, or at least not for another 10 years. The point is
that it’s still fun and exhilarating, both to the drivers and the
You can look at any field of science as a competition between different
groups all over the world. In science we also want to win; we want to be
first to make a new discovery. Our air sphere crystal paper in
Science was the first of its kind—if it hadn’t been,
Science would not have published it. And that was fun for the
participants and could be exhilarating for the onlookers. Science is also
very cruel in that sense. It’s like sports. You only remember the
gold medal winners from the Olympics. No one remembers who won the silver
medal. The other thing is that there’s always a new race. So each one
can have a different winner. So science is useful in the long term, but
it’s also fun in the short term. Finally, one often tends to forget
that doing top-level science is essential to train young researchers, who
are the people that make tomorrow's inventions.
What do you see happening with photonic crystal
research in the next few years?
Realizing that even my one-year prediction is likely to be completely
wrong, I’ll say that one thing I hope will happen—I don’t
know if it will—is that photonic crystals will branch out into other
fields of sciences. For instance, you can imagine that they might start
being used in biophysics and that there could be a whole field of
biophotonics changing the properties of biological systems in a novel way.
Furthermore, we will surely see surprises in our efforts to make more
efficient light sources, lasers, and LEDs. And I think that tiny and
sensitive photonic sensors could be a big hit in fields such as chemistry,
biology, and perhaps other life sciences.
Another thing that I would love to see within 10 years is that photonic
crystals will be used as elements in optical circuits. These are circuits
where photons are running around instead of electrons. That will be very
difficult to pull off, because photonic crystals as we now know them have
too many imperfections. But we have just come up with technological tricks
to use the light scattering from these imperfections to our
Prof. Dr. Willem L. Vos
FOM Institute AMOLF
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
University of Twente
Enschede, The Netherlands