• Skip to navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Corporate website
  • Customer Care
  • Training
  • FOLLOW US
  • SHARE
  • Special Topics
  • Supersymmetry
  • Top 20 Authors - Special Topic of Supersymmetry

Special Topic: Supersymmetry> Top 20 Authors

Published November 2011

  • ScienceWatch Home
  • Inside This Month...
  • Interviews
  • Special Topics
    • All Topics & Interviews
    • Date & Alphabetical Menu
    • What Are Special Topics?
    • Current Special Topic
  • Analyses
  • Data & Rankings
  • About Science Watch

FOLLOW US
SHARE

Authors | Institutions | Journals | Nations


Top 20 Authors

The authors with the greatest number of total citations in this analysis come from all over the world with only three institutions—the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS), the University of Chicago and Stanford—having more than one in the top 20. At the very top of the list, not surprisingly, is Jonathan Ellis of King's College London and CERN. Ellis has been a leading proponent of supersymmetric models since the early 1980s, while also demonstrating that the lightest supersymmetric particles are good candidates for the dark matter that pervades the universe. Ellis's long-time collaborator, Keith Olive of the University of Minnesota, sits at #3 on the author list.

Many of the authors on the top 20 list would also rank high on a listing of the most-cited authors in string theory and extra-dimensional universes—Shamit Kachru of Stanford, Juan Maldacena and Nima Arkani-Hamed of the IAS, and Cumrun Vafa of Harvard University, to name just a few.

 
  • Citations
  • Papers
  • Citations Per Paper
  • About the Authors
  • Overall General Information
  • Additional Information

Citations
   

Rank Author Citations Papers Cites per paper
1 Ellis, J
Special Topics Interview
4,632 134 34.57
2 Kachru, S
Special Topics Interview
3,951 42 94.07
3 Olive, KA
Special Topics Interview
3,792 85 44.61
4 Kallosh, R 3,346 50 66.92
5 Maldacena, J 3,342 32 104.44
6 Heinemeyer, S
Special Topics Interview
3,135 88 35.63
7 Weiglein, G 2,959 72 41.10
8 Cvetic, M
Special Topics Interview
2,764 62 44.58
9 Lust, D 2,643 67 39.45
10 Arkani-Hamed, N
Special Topics Interview
2,640 26 101.54
11 Porod, W 2,576 84 30.67
12 Wagner, CEM 2,524 42 60.10
13 Carena, M 2,446 41 59.66
14 Nomura, Y 2,408 56 43.00
15 Quevedo, F 2,230 44 50.68
16 Gauntlett, JP 2,197 52 42.25
17 Baer, H 2,186 83 26.34
18 Vafa, C 2,159 34 63.50
19 Moretti, S 2,101 53 39.64
20 Feng, JL 2,089 41 50.95

Papers
   

Rank Author Citations Papers Cites per paper
1 Ellis, J
Special Topics Interview
4,632 134 34.57
2 King, SF 1,917 96 19.97
3 Heinemeyer, S
Special Topics Interview
3,135 88 35.63
4 Olive, KA
Special Topics Interview
3,792 85 44.61
5 Porod, W 2,576 84 30.67
6 Baer, H 2,186 83 26.34
7 Banerjee, S 1,477 82 18.01
8 Dutta, B 1,443 79 18.27
9 Weber, M 1,541 79 19.51
10 Kobayashi, T 1,086 78 13.92
11 Nath, P 1,531 77 19.88
12 Shafi, Q 624 74 8.43
13 Weiglein, G 2,959 72 41.10
14 Ferrara, S 1,293 71 18.21
15 Kamon, T 1,442 71 20.31
16 Khalil, S 1,034 71 14.56
17 Shifman, M 1,240 71 17.46
18 Lyons, L 1,512 70 21.60
19 Kim, JE 1,234 69 17.88
20 Hollik, W 1,567 69 22.71

Cites Per Paper (>= 19 paper threshold)
   

Rank Author Citations Papers Cites per paper
1 Maldacena, J 3,342 32 104.44
2 Arkani-Hamed, N
Special Topics Interview
2,640 26 101.54
3 Trivedi, SP 2,039 21 97.10
4 Kachru, S
Special Topics Interview
3,951 42 94.07
5 Linde, A 2,034 23 88.43
6 Beisert, N 1,930 22 87.73
7 Bern, Z 1,403 20 70.15
8 Kallosh, R 3,346 50 66.92
9 Logan, HE 1,400 21 66.67
10 Blair, GA 1,460 22 66.36
11 Shiu, G 1,323 20 66.15
12 Strumia, A 1,238 19 65.16
13 Vafa, C 2,159 34 63.50
14 Uranga, AM 1,936 31 62.45
15 Richardson, P 1,173 19 61.74
16 Giudice, GF 1,648 27 61.04
17 Grana, M 1,215 20 60.75
18 Haber, HE 1,453 24 60.54
19 Wagner, CEM 2,524 42 60.10
20 Feruglio, F 1,141 19 60.05

About The Authors



The resulting database contained 21,944 authors. Ranked by three separate measures: citations, papers, and citations per paper. Source dates: January 1, 2001-September 26, 2011. *Unless otherwise specified, all rankings have a >= 5 paper threshold for all measures.

Look for complelte threshold information for the Special Topic of Supersymmetry in the "Methodology & Threshold" tab of the opening page for this topic.

Overall General Information


 
Regarding Top 20 Scientists, Institutions, Journals, & Nations

Citation tables allow us to map compelling trends:

  • Are there particular nations or institutions that might be expected to dominate research in the Topic area, and do the numbers bear out these expectations, or are there surprises?
  • Who are the leading scientists and where are they located?

While these tables cannot offer a complete picture, the number of trends and anomalies that can be spotlighted or connected across categories is striking. The tables often lead to renewed perspectives to further explore and validate.

What are Special Topics?



Special Topics, from ScienceWatch.com, is designed to complement Essential Science IndicatorsSM from Clarivate in providing citation analyses and commentary for selected scientific research areas that have experienced notable recent advances or are of special current interest.

Read about the overall methodology for Special Topics in the "What are Special Topics?" page.

 

EMAIL   |   BACK TO TOP


  • Special Topics
  • Supersymmetry
  • Top 20 Authors - Special Topic of Supersymmetry

Supersymmetry

© 2008 CERN.

 HOME PAGE OF TOPIC

  • Top 20: Authors | Institutions | Journals | Nations
  • Papers: 10-Year | 2-Year
  • Time Series Graphs
  • Field Distribution
  • Interviews

SPECIAL TOPICS

  • Complete Interview & Topic Menu; a list of all Special Topics with corresponding interviews, essays, or profiles.
  • All Topics; listed by date and alphabetically.
  • Special Topics Home
 

Figure: ATLAS collision event in which a microscopic-black-hole was produced in the collision of two protons. © 2008 CERN.

  • © 2020 Clarivate
  • Careers
  • Copyright
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Follow us Share to Twitter Share to LinkedIn Share to Facebook Share to Instagram