• Skip to navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Corporate website
  • Customer Care
  • Training
  • FOLLOW US
  • SHARE
  • Sci-Bytes
  • 2011
  • 05.29.2011- Who Supports Autism Research?

Sci-Bytes> Who Supports Autism Research?

Week of May 29, 2011

  • ScienceWatch Home
  • Inside This Month...
  • Interviews
  • Special Topics
  • Analyses
  • Data & Rankings
    • Sci-Bytes
    • Fast Breaking Papers
    • New Hot Papers
    • Emerging Research Fronts
    • Fast Moving Fronts
    • Research Front Maps
    • Current Classics
    • Top Topics
    • Rising Stars
    • New Entrants
    • Country Profiles
  • About Science Watch

FOLLOW US
SHARE

<BACK ¦ 2011 ¦ HOME
 

Top 20 funding agencies acknowledged on journal articles, August 2008-April 2011.

Rank Funding Agency Papers %
1 U.S. National Institutes of Health (Institute not specified) 379 4.75
2 U.S. National Institute of Mental Health 221 2.77
3 Autism Speaks 108 1.35
4 U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 106 1.33
5 U.K. Medical Research Council 78 0.98
6 Canadian Institutes of Health Research 75 0.94
7 U.S. National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke 69 0.86
8 U.K. Wellcome Trust 67 0.84
9 Simons Foundation 57 0.71
10 U.S. National Science Foundation 55 0.69
11 European Union/European Community 52 0.65
12 Cure Autism Now Foundation 42 0.53
13 National Alliance for Autism Research 41 0.51
14 German Research Foundation 34 0.43
15 Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan 32 0.40
16 U.S. National Center for Research Resources 26 0.33
17 Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation 21 0.26
18 Genome Canada 20 0.25
19 U.K. Economic and Social Research Council 20 0.25
20 INSERM 19 0.24
SOURCE: Thomson Reuters Web of Science®, August 2008 – April 2011.

In August 2008, Clarivate began to record funding acknowledgements from the papers it indexes for its Web of Science database. In addition to the name of the organization listed as a source of support, grant numbers are also captured (if given), as well as the acknowledgement paratext that provides further details of financial and other types of assistance.

The presence of funding acknowledgements in the database allows research inputs (financial support) to be linked, at the paper level, with research outputs (publications) and their impacts (measured by citation counts). The analysis of such linkages is complicated for several reasons: papers may and often do mention multiple funders, and different papers may acknowledge the same grant from the same funder. Also, authors who receive a grant may neglect to acknowledge this funding source in their papers. Despite these complexities, various analyses are now possible that could not be attempted previously, since one-by-one, manual look-ups were typically needed to obtain the input-output data at the paper level.

An example of what could not be produced in a practical way formerly appears above. A search of the Web of Science for research papers on autism identified 7,984 journal articles indexed since August 2008. The table above lists the top 20 funders acknowledged on those papers. The U.S. National Institutes of Health is clearly the world leader in funding autism research. (Some of the acknowledgements captured fail to mention a specific NIH institute.) Other major governmental support comes from the U.K. Medical Research Council, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the U.S. National Science Foundation, and the European Union. Strongly present, as well, are a number of charitable organizations: the U.K. Wellcome Trust, the Simons Foundation, as well as the disease-specific organization Autism Speaks. It should be noted that the National Alliance for Autism Research and the Cure Autism Now Foundation were merged with Autism Speaks in 2006 and 2007, respectively.

A comprehensive analysis of the impact for each funding agency, in terms of citations to the papers they supported, is probably premature since there has not been sufficient time for these publications to attract enough citations to assure a credible result, especially for those papers published in the last year. However, in a year or two more, such a study will be possible. Of course, papers should be evaluated by the fields they represent, since different fields exhibit different citation averages.

The “first fruits” of funding acknowledgement analysis are beginning to appear in the literature. Recently, Jue Wang and Philip Shapira have undertaken analyses of the funding of nanotechnology research through a survey of some 61,300 papers in this field, August 2008 through July 2009: Philip Shapira and Jue Wang, “Follow the money: What was the impact of the nanotechnology funding boom of the past ten years?” Nature, 468: 627-628, 2 December 2010, and Jue Wang and Philip Shapira, “Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology,” forthcoming in Scientometrics. Also, a working paper on the possibilities and challenges for such analyses has recently appeared: John Rigby, Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: An examination of new dimensions and new controversies for bibliometrics. Manchester Business School, Working Paper, No. 611. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.

Click here to view more information on funding acknowledgement data in the Web of Science.

 
 

EMAIL   |   BACK TO TOP


  • Sci-Bytes
  • 2011
  • 05.29.2011- Who Supports Autism Research?

Spotlighted Feature

Droplets of morning dew hang onto the leaves of crops in a field in the village of Founex near Geneva October 27, 2006. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse.Special Country Features:

Top 20 Countries: Citations in Five-Year Increments, and the 10th annual list of the Top 20 Countries in ALL FIELDS, 2001-August 31, 2011.

Sci-Bytes

  • Home
  • All Years Archive

What's Hot In...

  • Biology
  • Medicine
  • Physics
  • Chemistry

  • © 2020 Clarivate
  • Careers
  • Copyright
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Follow us Share to Twitter Share to LinkedIn Share to Facebook Share to Instagram