Top 100 Materials Scientists
Special Report on High-Impact Materials Scientists
On March 2, 2011,
Thomson
Reuters released data identifying the world’s
top 100 materials scientists who achieved the highest citation impact
scores for their papers (articles and reviews) published since January
2000.
Impact is a weighted measure of influence that seeks to reveal consistently superior performance. To ensure that a high score could not be achieved by a few highly cited papers, a threshold of 25 papers was used in the analysis. The average citation impact in materials science for the period was 6.93, so all the researchers listed above achieved more than six times that mark.
Top 100 Materials Scientists, 2000-10, Ranked by
Citation Impact |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Scientist | Papers | Citations | Impact |
1 [C 10] |
Peidong YANG University of California Berkeley |
36 | 13,900 | 386.11 |
2 [C 55] |
Yadong YIN University of California Riverside |
32 | 6,387 | 199.59 |
3 |
Michael H. HUANG National Tsing Hua University |
34 | 5,439 | 159.97 |
4 [C 35] |
Younan XIA Washington University St. Louis |
83 | 11,936 | 143.81 |
5 [C 61] |
Yugang SUN Argonne National Laboratory |
37 | 5,231 | 141.38 |
6 |
Yiying WU Ohio State University |
74 | 9,590 | 129.59 |
7 |
Jan C. HUMMELEN University of Groningen |
38 | 4,643 | 122.18 |
8 [C 47] |
Alan J. HEEGER University of California Santa Barbara |
49 | 5,788 | 118.12 |
9 |
Oomman K. VARGHESE, Pennsylvania State University |
28 | 3,021 | 107.89 |
10 [C 32] |
Catherine J. MURPHY University of Illinois Urbana-Campaign |
31 | 3,313 | 106.87 |
11 |
Michael D. MCGEHEE Stanford University |
26 | 2,651 | 101.96 |
12 |
Christoph J. BRABEC University of Erlangen-Nuremberg |
43 | 4,242 | 98.65 |
13 |
Stephen R. FORREST University of Michigan |
25 | 2,417 | 96.68 |
14 |
N. Serdar SARICIFTCI Johannes Kepler University of Linz |
74 | 6,444 | 87.08 |
15 |
Herbert GLEITER Karlsruhe Institute of Technology |
29 | 2,440 | 84.14 |
16 |
Rodney S. RUOFF University of Texas Austin |
25 | 2,060 | 82.40 |
17 |
Frank CARUSO University of Melbourne |
74 | 5,589 | 75.53 |
18 |
Philippe DUBOIS University of Mons |
36 | 2,628 | 73.00 |
19 [C 37] |
Taeghwan HYEON Seoul National University |
37 | 2,685 | 72.57 |
20 [C 41] |
Xiangfeng DUAN University of California Los Angeles |
39 | 2,825 | 72.44 |
21 |
Rachel A. CARUSO University of Melbourne |
27 | 1,948 | 72.15 |
22 |
Galen D. STUCKY University of California Santa Barbara |
72 | 5,095 | 70.76 |
23 |
Igor V. ALEXANDROV Ufa State Aviation Technical University |
38 | 2,555 | 67.24 |
24 [C 70] |
Nicholas A. KOTOV University of Michigan |
36 | 2,388 | 66.33 |
25 |
Craig A. GRIMES Pennsylvania State University |
55 | 3,626 | 65.93 |
26 |
Ullrich SCHERF University of Wuppertal |
64 | 4,099 | 64.05 |
27 |
Andreas STEIN University of Minnesota |
47 | 2,985 | 63.51 |
28 |
Subra SURESH Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
64 | 4,024 | 62.88 |
29 [C 53] |
Shaik M. ZAKEERUDDIN, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne |
27 | 1,670 | 61.85 |
30 |
Ray H. BAUGHMAN University of Texas Dallas |
25 | 1,503 | 60.12 |
31 |
Paul W.M. BLOM University of Groningen |
37 | 2,176 | 58.81 |
32 |
Jenny NELSON Imperial College London |
31 | 1,821 | 58.74 |
33 |
David J. MOONEY Harvard University |
43 | 2,512 | 58.42 |
34 |
Tsu-Wei CHOU University of Delaware |
33 | 1,915 | 58.03 |
35 |
Iain MCCULLOCH Imperial College London |
30 | 1,725 | 57.50 |
36 |
Andreas GREINER University of Marburg |
30 | 1,716 | 57.20 |
37 |
Ferdi SCHÜTH Max Planck Institute for Coal Research |
60 | 3,395 | 56.58 |
38 |
Henning SIRRINGHAUS University of Cambridge |
39 | 2,173 | 55.72 |
39 |
Samson A. JENEKHE University of Washington |
27 | 1,490 | 55.19 |
40 |
C. SURYANARAYANA University of Central Florida |
33 | 1,801 | 54.58 |
41 |
James R. DURRANT Imperial College London |
31 | 1,669 | 53.84 |
42 |
Guillermo C. BAZAN University of California Santa Barbara |
55 | 2,960 | 53.82 |
43 |
Meixiang WAN Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Beijing |
29 | 1,557 | 53.69 |
44 |
Pierre-Antoine ALBOUY University of Paris-Sud 11 |
28 | 1,503 | 53.68 |
45 |
Dietmar W. HUTMACHER Queensland University of Technology |
39 | 2,092 | 53.64 |
46 |
Anders HAGFELDT Uppsala University |
26 | 1,385 | 53.27 |
47 |
Dago M. DE LEEUW University of Groningen and Philips Research Laboratories |
32 | 1,704 | 53.25 |
48 [C 42] |
Michael GRÄTZEL, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne |
52 | 2,763 | 53.13 |
49 |
Zhifeng REN Boston College |
37 | 1,963 | 53.05 |
50 [C 12] |
Mark E. THOMPSON, University of Southern California |
28 | 1,482 | 52.93 |
51 |
Andrey L. ROGACH City University of Hong Kong |
34 | 1,781 | 52.38 |
52 |
Rinat K. ISLAMGALIEV Ufa State Aviation Technical University |
37 | 1,926 | 52.05 |
53 |
Mats R. ANDERSSON Chalmers University of Technology |
28 | 1,449 | 51.75 |
54 |
Mietek JARONIEC Kent State University |
54 | 2,771 | 51.31 |
55 |
Fujio IZUMI National Institute for Materials Science, Japan |
25 | 1,277 | 51.08 |
56 |
Simon R. PHILLPOT University of Florida |
29 | 1,481 | 51.07 |
57 |
Neil COOMBS University of Toronto |
25 | 1,269 | 50.76 |
58 |
Terry C. LOWE Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. |
28 | 1,416 | 50.57 |
59 |
Wolfgang J. PARAK University of Marburg |
27 | 1,365 | 50.56 |
60 |
Marie-Paule PILENI University Pierre & Marie Curie |
32 | 1,612 | 50.38 |
61 |
Jonathan N. COLEMAN Trinity College Dublin |
30 | 1,507 | 50.23 |
62 |
Zhenan BAO Stanford University |
38 | 1,907 | 50.18 |
63 |
Dieter NEHER University of Potsdam |
30 | 1,499 | 49.97 |
64 |
Dieter WOLF Idaho National Laboratory |
26 | 1,285 | 49.42 |
65 |
Kornelius NIELSCH University of Hamburg |
27 | 1,322 | 48.96 |
66 |
Yet-Ming CHIANG Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
26 | 1,254 | 48.23 |
67 |
Joachim H WENDORFF University of Marburg |
30 | 1,430 | 47.67 |
68 |
Antonios G. MIKOS Rice University |
95 | 4,507 | 47.44 |
69 |
John R. REYNOLDS University of Florida |
45 | 2,131 | 47.36 |
70 |
David GROSSO University Pierre & Marie Curie |
55 | 2,548 | 46.33 |
71 [C 65] |
Richard H. FRIEND, University of Cambridge |
60 | 2,775 | 46.25 |
72 |
Paula T. HAMMOND Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
42 | 1,927 | 45.88 |
73 |
Richard W. SIEGEL Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
31 | 1,419 | 45.77 |
74 |
Fred WUDL University of California Santa Barbara |
25 | 1,141 | 45.64 |
75 [C 63] |
Craig J. HAWKER, University of California Santa Barbara |
34 | 1,548 | 45.53 |
76 |
Peter X. MA University of Michigan |
30 | 1,352 | 45.07 |
77 |
Karine ALSELME Upper Alsace University |
25 | 1,122 | 44.88 |
78 |
David L. KAPLAN Tufts University |
77 | 3,408 | 44.26 |
79 |
Donal D.C. BRADLEY Imperial College London |
57 | 2,522 | 44.25 |
80 |
Kam W. LEONG Duke University |
45 | 1,991 | 44.24 |
81 |
Yeshayahu LIFSHITZ Technion -- Israeli Institute of Technology |
25 | 1,097 | 43.88 |
82 |
John A. ROGERS University of Illinois Urbana-Campaign |
61 | 2,671 | 43.79 |
83 [C 74] |
Michael GIERSIG, Free University of Berlin |
36 | 1,570 | 43.61 |
84 |
Jean-Luc BRÉDAS Georgia Institute of Technology |
50 | 2,177 | 43.54 |
85 |
Thomas E. MALLOUK Pennsylvania State University |
35 | 1,523 | 43.51 |
86 |
Caroline A. ROSS Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
27 | 1,174 | 43.48 |
87 |
John W. HUTCHINSON Harvard University |
42 | 1,824 | 43.43 |
88 |
David BELJONNE University of Mons |
25 | 1,085 | 43.40 |
89 [C 44] |
Horst WELLER University of Hamburg |
25 | 1,082 | 43.28 |
90 |
Frederik C. KREBS Risø DTU National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy |
48 | 2,077 | 43.27 |
91 |
Linda S. SCHADLER Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
42 | 1,817 | 43.26 |
92 |
René A.J. JANSSEN Eindhoven University of Technology |
61 | 2,633 | 43.16 |
93 |
Young-Woo HEO Kyungpook National University |
30 | 1,294 | 43.13 |
94 |
Alan H. WINDLE University of Cambridge |
36 | 1,552 | 43.11 |
95 |
Andrew I. COOPER University of Liverpool |
30 | 1,284 | 42.80 |
96 |
Markus NIEDERBERGER Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich |
36 | 1,537 | 42.69 |
97 |
Antonio FACCHETTI Northwestern University and Polyera Corporation |
37 | 1,579 | 42.68 |
98 |
Nicola PINNA University of Aveiro and Seoul National University |
25 | 1,057 | 42.28 |
99 |
Xiang Min MENG Chinese Academy of Sciences, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Beijing |
31 | 1,309 | 42.23 |
100 |
William D. NIX Stanford University |
49 | 2,065 | 42.14 |
Note: Sixteen of those listed also ranked in the top 100 by citation impact in chemistry, among those who published 50 or more papers in that field during the last decade. Their ranks in chemistry [C] are noted beneath their ranks in materials science. SOURCE: Essential Science IndicatorsSM from Thomson Reuters, January 1, 2000 – October 31, 2010. |
In recognition of the 2011 being named the International Year of Chemistry, this publication previously featured a list of the top 100 chemists over the last decade according to citation impact (citations per paper).
In that analysis, a set of discipline-specific journals defined the field of chemistry and, as a supplement, selected papers in multidisciplinary journals such as Science and Nature were also added. But it must be admitted that chemistry is difficult to define precisely.
To supplement the previous treatment, the current table presents data on high impact researchers in materials science, a realm that overlaps with chemistry as well as with physics, engineering, and other areas. Once again, this field was defined by a set of discipline-specific journals and papers dealing with materials science from multidisciplinary titles. Influential biochemists will be the focus on another feature in the future in order to round out this review of chemistry.
The table lists the 100 researchers in materials science who achieved the highest citation impact scores for their papers (articles and reviews) published since January 2000. Impact is a weighted measure of influence that seeks to reveal consistently superior performance. To ensure that a high score could not be achieved by a few highly cited papers, a threshold of 25 papers was used in the analysis. The average citation impact in materials science for the period was 6.93, so all the researchers listed above achieved more than six times that mark.
Since approximately a half million materials scientists were recorded in the journal publications indexed by Clarivate during the last decade, these 100 represent the top fiftieth of one percent. Sixteen of those listed also ranked in the top 100 by citation impact in chemistry, among those who published 50 or more papers in that field during the last decade. Their ranks in chemistry [C] are noted beneath their ranks in materials science.
As with the Chemistry 100 table, this list includes many researchers who state that a main or significant focus of their research is nanotechnology – by our count 78 of the 100.
The national affiliations of the authors are: 48 for the United States; 11 for Germany; eight for the United Kingdom; four each for France and the Netherlands; three for Australia, China, South Korea, and Switzerland; two for Belgium, Russia, and Sweden; and one apiece for Austria, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Portugal, and Taiwan (total is 101 due to Pinna’s appointments both in Portugal and in South Korea).
The institutions appearing three or more times are: University of California Santa Barbara (5), Imperial College London (4), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4), Pennsylvania State University (3), Stanford University (3), University of Cambridge (3), University of Groningen (3), University of Marburg (3), and University of Michigan (3).
For more information, view Essential Science IndicatorsSM from Clarivate.
SCI-BYTES SPECIAL REPORTS
THE TOP 100 SCIENTISTS IN:
Chemistry
Materials
Science
Learn about the Global Research Report:
Focus on Materials Science & Technology.
Sci-Bytes
What's Hot In...
Current Special Topic