wenty years or so ago, human immunodeficiency virus seemed like a very odd organism. Just outside the Top Ten, at #12, is a paper that casts HIV as just another virus (E.S. Rosenberg, et al., "Vigorous HIV-1 specific CD4+ T cell responses associated with control of viremia," Science, 278(5342):1447-50, 21 November 1997; cited 34 times this period). In particular, Bruce Walker and his team at the Partners AIDS Research Center of Massachusetts General Hospital show that the immune system is capable of responding to HIV, and that this response is a very important component of the body's ability to control viremia, the level of virus circulating the blood. "HIV follows the rules that other viruses follow—that's what's so important," Walker tells Science Watch. "It's not something that marches to its own drum. It's doing things in a predictable way." Walker has spent his research career looking at the immune system correlates of HIV. His is the first group to show a clear association between a virus-specific immune response and the ability to control the virus. The paper demonstrates a clear association between strong responses by cytotoxic cells and by helper cells. "The evolving notion is that people control viremia because they have CD4+ cells that provide help to the CD8+ cells," Walker explains. "It is the CTL [killer] cells that mediate the control, but they need virus-specific helper cells." The vast majority of HIV-infected people have undetectably low levels of CD4+ helper cells. But these cells can be induced. This fascinating discovery came about because of earlier work showing that cytotoxic T cells were an important part of the response to HIV. That surprised people at the time because the received wisdom was that HIV dismantled the immune system. It was as a result of that work that a very unusual patient landed on Walker's doorstep. He was a hemophiliac who could document the start of his infection more than 18 years before. "As clinicians we were all seeing patients come in, get worse, and die," Walker said. The hemophiliac patient simply had no problem. Walker's response was simple: "This guy is doing something other people aren't." The voluntary arrival of subject 161-J, whom Walker describes as a "critical" individual for the understanding of HIV, prompted an in-depth immunological study. Walker is quick to point out that 161-J's survival has "absolutely nothing to do with the mode of transmission." In fact, it seems that one or two percent of the population has the ability to keep the virus under control—to become, in the jargon, non-progressors. And Walker's results point the way to helping others achieve similar status. What seems to be happening is that when people first get infected, the CD4+ helper cells are activated. Unfortunately, HIV preferentially attacks those activated CD4+ cells, so they are not in a position to offer much in the way of help to the killer CD8+ cells. But reducing the viral load with drugs, at the same time as inducing viral-specific CD4+ cells with a vaccine, could allow chronically-infected patients to control the disease. In effect you would give intermittent therapy, boosting the immune response by re-exposing the patients to their own virus. Walker describes the approach as "structured treatment interruptions," and points out that the paper suggests such a regime "deserves to be tested." And it has been. A couple of ongoing studies have taken up the challenge. Walker's group has a trial in which patients have been given either a vaccine against HIV or a control vaccine. "The next step will be to take them off therapy and see whether they can control the virus," Walker tells Science Watch. The reality is that most viral infections are not
eliminated, but are just controlled by the immune system. Diseases such as
chicken pox or mono remain in the body, possibly to flare up and then be
brought back under control. "We now have evidence that HIV can be
held in check," Walker says. "And we're getting closer to having
a target to aim at for inducing immune responses in people who are not
controlling the virus." Science
writer Dr. Jeremy Cherfas
|
Search | Jan/Feb 2000 Index | Archives | Contact | Home
|
|
|
|
|
Science
Watch® is an editorial component of Essential
Science Indicators |
|
|
|
(c) 2008 The
Thomson Corporation. |