Science Watch® - Tracking Trends and Performance in Basic Research
January/February 2005


Hunting Down Foxp3’s Influence on Regulatory T Cells
by Jeremy Cherfas
WHAT'S HOT IN
B I O L O G Y
Rank      Paper Citations This Period (Jul-Aug 04) Rank Last Period (May-Jun 04)
1 R.H. Waterston, et al. (Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium), "Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome," Nature, 420(6915): 520-62, 5 December 2002. [46 institutions worldwide] *621VK 91 1
2 B. Boeckmann, et al., "The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003," Nucl. Acids Res., 31(1): 365-70, 1 January 2003. [Swiss Inst. Bioinformatics, Geneva; EMBL-Europ. Bioinformatics Inst., Cambridge, U.K.] *647EP 58 3
3 M. Zuker, et al., "Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction," Nucl. Acids Res., 31(13): 3406-15, 1 July 2003. [Rensselaer Polytech. Inst., Troy, NY] *695LT 40
4 Y.-X. Jiang, et al., "X-ray structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel," Nature, 423(6935): 33-41, 1 May 2003. [Howard Hughes Med. Inst., Rockefeller U., New York, NY] *673CG 37 4
5 S. Hori, T. Nomura, S. Sakaguchi, "Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3," Science, 299(5609): 1057-61, 14 February 2003. [Inst. Phys. Chem. Res., Yokohama, Japan; Kyoto U., Japan] *645DB 37
6 T.I. Lee, et al., "Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae," Science, 298(5594): 799-804, 25 October 2002. [Whitehead Inst., Cambridge, MA; MIT, Cambridge, MA] *607KR 33
7 J.D. Fontenot, M.A. Gavin, A.Y. Rudensky, "Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells," Nature Immunol., 4(4): 799-804, April 2003. [Howard Hughes Med. Inst., U. Washington, Seattle] *663CG 33
8 R.A. Holt, et al., "The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae," Science, 298(5591): 129, 4 October 2002. [19 institutions worldwide] *600BJ 32
9 J.M. Alonso, et al., "Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana," Science, 301(5633): 653-7, 1 August 2003. [Salk Inst. Biol. Stud., La Jolla, CA; Plant Biotech. Inst., Saskatoon, Canada; U. Calif., San Diego] *706UN 32
10 S. Aparicio, et al., "Whole-genome shotgun assembly and analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes," Science, 297(5585): 1301-10, 23 August 2002. [10 institutions worldwide] *586FL 31
 SOURCE: Thomson Scientific Hot Papers DatabaseRead  the Legend.

The mammalian body’s immune system walks a perilous tightrope. On one side is the need to recognize and destroy invading pathogens while on the other is the danger of turning the same forces on itself, resulting in a range of autoimmune diseases. An essential feature of this balancing act is the ability of some immune-system cells specifically to suppress other immune-system cells, namely those that react to self antigens. The cells that suppress self-reaction are called regulatory T cells (TR), and two papers new to the What’s Hot list independently identify a transcription factor that controls the development of TR cells.

Shimon Sakaguchi and colleagues at Kyoto University in Japan, and Alexander Rudensky and colleagues at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the University of Washington, Seattle, both showed that a forkhead transcription factor Foxp3 is the essential element in creating TR cells. Sakaguchi, at #5, beat Rudensky, at #7, to the punch by a matter of weeks, but the two teams used essentially similar methods.

The starting observation is that in animal models a reduction in TR cells is associated with various organ-specific autoimmune diseases, such as thyroiditis, gastritis, and type 1 diabetes. In humans, some genetic diseases that are associated with autoimmune problems have an imbalance in the TR cells. A mutant mouse strain, called scurfy, which exhibits similar autoimmune symptoms, and the human genetic diseases, both show mutations in Foxp3. So, does Foxp3 actually regulate the development of TR cells, or is it merely associated with their functioning?

TR cells seem to be created both in the thymus and in the periphery. Sakaguchi’s group looked at the mRNA being made by immature T cells in the thymus. Those that expressed the CD25 marker associated with TR cells also expressed Foxp3 mRNA, while other immature T cells did not. However, the T cells are not merely making Foxp3 in response to activation, because stimulating those cells with self antigens did not affect the level of Foxp3 expression. However, putting an active Foxp3 gene into naïve T cells turned those cells into ones that responded almost exactly like natural TR cells. In vitro they suppressed T cells active against self antigens. And in a mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune gastritis, T cells with Foxp3 were as effective as natural TR cells in preventing the symptoms of disease.

Sakaguchi’s paper thus goes a very long way towards establishing that Foxp3 is an essential master gene that controls the development of TR cells. Rudensky’s adds some additional evidence. In addition to showing that TR cells express Foxp3, Rudensky’s group deleted the gene in mice and showed that these mice both succumb to disease almost indistinguishable from that of the natural scurfy mutants and lack TR cells. Giving natural TR cells to Foxp3-deficient mice prevents disease, showing that the lack of Foxp3 is associated with a lack of TR cells.

The therapeutic implications of this work are far-reaching. For autoimmune diseases it might be possible to harvest T cells specific to self antigens and turn them into TR cells by transfecting them with Foxp3. Transplant rejection could likewise be controlled by creating appropriately targeted TR cells. Sakaguchi calls these "made-to-order regulatory T cells." Decreasing the number or activity of TR cells, perhaps by blocking Foxp3, might help the body to reject tumors and could boost the effectiveness of vaccines.

Recently Sakaguchi has published the results of a study specifically examining Foxp3 in human TR cells (see H. Yagi, et al., "Crucial role of Foxp3 in the development and function of human CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells," Internat. Immunol., 16[11]: 1643-56, November 2004). Fortunately, perhaps, the story is essentially the same. As in mice, human TR cells express Foxp3, and the transfer of Foxp3 into naïve T cells converts them into cells that are to all intents and purposes TR cells. However, in humans as in mice, the mechanism by which TR cells suppress the activation and multiplication of other T cells remains, at present, somewhat mysterious. The two mouse papers both show that TR cells need to be in contact with the self-reactive T cells to regulate them, and the same is true of human TR cells. However the details of the interaction, especially when compared to the activity of other types of T cell, remain complex and somewhat contradictory and will take more research to elucidate.end

Dr. Jeremy Cherfas is Science Writer at the
International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.

Science Watch®, January/February 2005, Vol. 16, No. 1
Citing URL: http://www.sciencewatch.com/jan-feb2005/sw_jan-feb2005_page
8.htm

Search | Jan/Feb 2005 Index | Archives | Contact | Home

What's New in Research - (Updated weekly) - What's NEW in Research
The Most-Cited Researchers in...
  |  Analysis Of...  |  Site Map by Field | ! QUICK SCIENCE !
Alphabetized List of All Essential Science Indicators Editorial Features/Interviews


Science Watch® is an editorial component of Essential Science Indicators. RSS Feeds for Essential Science Indicator's editorial Web sites
Visit other editorial components of ESI: "in-cites" and "Special Topics."
Write to the Webmaster with questions or comments about this site. Terms of Usage.
View all the products of the Research Services Group from Thomson Scientific.


(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.
Thomson Scientific