Five of the papers in the current list are about carbon nanotubes: #2, #3, #4, #9 and #10. All but one of these (#4) bear the name of Nobel laureate Richard E. Smalley, and all but one (#2) are new to the list. However, two in particular stand out as quite remarkable (#3 and #4), and together they report some definitive work on the structure and conductivity of single wall nanotubes (SWNT). Graphite consists of layers of carbon atoms, called graphene sheets, in which carbon atoms are arranged in a honeycomb pattern with a film of delocalized electrons covering the whole layer. It is this which makes non-metallic graphite able to conduct electricity. But if a single graphene sheet is rolled into a seamless tube, a SWNT, will it still be as good at conducting electricity? The answer is that it all depends on its structure, because such a tube can be rolled straight or at an angle. If it is straight, with a diameter of ten carbon atoms, then it is called a (10,0) tube. If it is rolled an angle and links up with a carbon that is seven atoms further along the sheet then it is a helical tube coded (10,7). Only one of these arrangements will be conducting. Nanotubes were discovered in 1991, and predictions about their electrical behavior suggested that some SWNTs would conduct while others would be semiconductors. Proving this posed seemingly insurmountable problems. Laser vaporized graphite condenses into a tangle of nanotubes of all shapes and sizes, including multi-layered tubes. To pick out just the right SWNTs and measure their electronic properties looked an impossible task, but in the January 1st, 1998 edition of Nature there appeared two remarkable papers that reported success. These are papers #3 and #4 in the current Hot Ten. The first comes from the laboratory of the worlds leading authority on complex carbon structures, Richard E. Smalley at Rice University, Houston, Texas, and the work was done in conjunction with Jeroen Wildoers groups at Delft University of Technology in The Netherlands. While #4 comes from Charles Lieber and colleagues based at Harvard University. Both papers report essentially the same information, albeit with slightly different emphasis. Both groups have resolved the structure of SWNT tube walls with an accuracy hitherto unachievable, and sufficient for them to determine not only the diameter of the tube, but their exact helicity. Lieber found that samples of SWNT exhibited many different structures, with no one species dominating thereby refuting earlier suggestions that one particular type of tubethe (10,10) tubewould dominate. Paper #3 reports the electronic properties of 27 SWNTs of various sizes and wrapping angles. These spanned a range of structural types, and for 18 of them their electronic features were measured: 12 were found to be semiconductors, 6 were conducting. The former had energy band gaps of around 0.5 - 0.6 electronvolts, whereas the latter had Egap in the range 1.7-2.0 eV showing they were metallic. Together papers #3 and #4 confirm the theory that (n,0) tubes will be metallic when n/3 is an integer, and the same will be true of (n,m) tubes if 2n+m is exactly divisible by three. Thus (10,0) wont conduct but (10,7) will. "These structure-dependent variations in electronic properties are unique to SWNT materials and offer great promise for the emerging field on nano molecular electronics," says Lieber, but he acknowledges that there is still a long way to go before this happens. "Until methods are developed to either separate or synthesize tubes with specific diameters and wrapping angles, then structure-dependent variations in electronic properties will inhibit the use of SWNTs in electronic applications." However, Lieber points out that
important applications are already emerging, such as in molecularly sharp probes with
chemical and biological functions; he cites more recent work in this area that the Harvard
group have been doing (Nature, 398:52, 1998). A recent issue of the Journal of
Materials Research, which was devoted entirely to nanotubes, also carried a paper from
his group (13:2380, 1998), and Lieber hints at more exciting revelations in the coming
months. Watch this space! Dr. John Emsley is
Science Writer in Residence |
| Science
Watch®, January/February 1999, Vol. 10, No. 1 Citing URL: http://www.sciencewatch.com/jan-feb99/sw_jan-feb99_page7.htm |
Search | Jan/Feb 1999 Index | Archives | Contact | Home
|
|
|
|
|
Science
Watch® is an editorial component of Essential
Science Indicators |
|
|
|
(c) 2008 The
Thomson Corporation. |