


| U.S. University
"Top Tens": Harvard, Stanford Still Tops |
by
Christopher King
|
|
 his marks the fourth installment in a series, now having appeared every four years since 1994, in which Science Watch presents "Top Ten" rankings of the top 100 federally funded U.S. universities, based on the citation impact of their published research in major fields of science and the social sciences. The latest two-part collection of listings shows the universities whose research papers attracted citations at a rate notably above the world average in each of 21 fields over the last five years. Nine
rankings in the biological sciences appear in the tables
below. Additional rankings covering the physical and social sciences will appear in the next issue.
|
Highest Impact U.S. Universities, 2001-2005
(Ranked by frequency of Top Ten
appearances in 21 fields)
| Rank |
Institution |
Top
Ten Appearances |
| 1 |
Harvard University |
15 |
| 2 |
Stanford University |
13 |
| 3 |
Univ. Calif., Berkeley |
10 |
| 4 |
University of Washington |
8 |
| 5 |
MIT |
7 |
| 6 |
Yale University |
6 |
| 7 |
Univ. Calif., San Diego |
6 |
| 8 |
Princeton University |
5 |
| 9 |
University of Pennsylvania |
5 |
| 10 |
Caltech |
5 |
| 11 |
Univ. Calif., San Francisco |
5 |
| 12 |
Columbia University |
5 |
|
|
As the table at right shows, Harvard University makes the highest number of Top Ten placements, appearing in 15 of the 21 rankings, matching its performance in
the 2002 installment. And as was the case four years ago, Stanford University is second, finishing here with 13 Top Ten appearances. Those two schools have vied for top honors throughout this series, with Stanford grabbing the lead spot in 1994 but Harvard taking it over ever since. Among the universities listed here, four others also deserve special mention: MIT, Yale, Caltech, and the University of California
(UC), Berkeley. All have now appeared among the page-one honorees in all four of these Top Ten roundups since 1994. Nearly as impressively, the University of Washington and UC San Diego have each appeared among the top finishers in three of the four surveys. (The previous two surveys, incidentally, can be viewed at sciencewatch.com, in the September/October and November/December issues for
1998 and
2002.) Also noteworthy in the table are the University of Pennsylvania and UC San Francisco, both making their first appearances—even if their tallies of five placements are below the threshold of six or more employed in the previous roundups.
This survey, like its predecessors, derives from the exclusive publication and citation data in Thomson Scientific’s University Science Indicators database. In 21 fields, each defined by a discrete set of Thomson-indexed journals, Science Watch calculated the citations-per-paper (impact) score for each university, based on papers published and cited between 2001 and 2005. The resulting figure was compared to a world baseline figure representing the impact for the field during the same period. This produced a "relative impact" score, expressed as a percentage. In the field of neurosciences & behavior, for example, papers from MIT were cited, on average, 16.31 times during 2001-05. The world average for the field was 7.88. MIT, therefore, scored 107% above the world average in its first-place ranking in the field, followed by Rockefeller University, which scored 105% above the world mark. (Tie scores in relative impact were handled in two ways: preference was given to universities that displayed a higher impact score before the "relative" figure was calculated and rounded off—as in clinical medicine, for example, where the Oregon Health & Science University cites-per-paper score of 9.96 slightly edged the 9.94 cites posted by Johns Hopkins. When the impact score itself happened to be identical, priority went to the university that produced a greater number of papers.)
A slightly different ranking for these 12 universities can be obtained by calculating their average placements (that is, by taking the sum of their ranks and then dividing by the number of appearances). By this measure, Yale scored the highest average placement with a score of 2.67, followed MIT at 3.00, then Harvard (3.80), Princeton (4.40), Stanford and Penn (5.00), UC San Diego (5.33), Caltech (5.60), U. Washington (5.63), UC Berkeley (6.10), UC San Francisco (6.60), and Columbia
(7.20).
|
Top
Ten Universities in
Biological Science Fields, 2001-2005 |
|

| Rank |
Institution |
#
of
Papers |
Relative
Impact (%) |
|
| 1 |
Harvard
University |
18,800 |
+103 |
| 2 |
Vanderbilt University |
4,065 |
+102 |
| 3 |
U. Massachusetts, Worcester |
1,612 |
+94 |
| 4 |
Stanford University |
6,298 |
+93 |
| 5 |
Univ. Calif., San Diego |
5,044 |
+93 |
| 6 |
Univ. Texas, San Antonio |
2,576 |
+90 |
| 7 |
Tufts University |
3,002 |
+88 |
| 8 |
Oregon Health &
Sci. Univ. |
3,111 |
+84 |
| 9 |
Johns Hopkins University |
12,066 |
+84 |
10
 |
Emory University |
4,857 |
+84 |
|
Clinical
Medicine
³1,200 Papers |

| Rank |
Institution |
#
of
Papers |
Relative
Impact (%) |
|
| 1 |
MIT |
319 |
+107 |
| 2 |
Rockefeller University |
444 |
+105 |
| 3 |
Stanford University |
1,410 |
+77 |
| 4 |
Washington University |
1,297 |
+74 |
| 5 |
Baylor Coll. of Medicine |
733 |
+71 |
| 6 |
Univ. Calif., San Francisco |
1,547 |
+69 |
| 7 |
Univ. Texas Southwestern
Med. Ctr., Dallas |
672 |
+69 |
| 8 |
Harvard University |
3,486 |
+64 |
| 9 |
Emory University |
1,115 |
+57 |
10
 |
Univ. Calif., Berkeley |
469 |
+57 |
|
Neurosciences
³300 Papers |

| Rank |
Institution |
#
of
Papers |
Relative
Impact (%) |
|
| 1 |
Oregon State University |
420 |
+65 |
| 2 |
Univ. Wisconsin, Madison |
765 |
+56 |
| 3 |
Cornell University |
824 |
+56 |
| 4 |
Rutgers University |
381 |
+53 |
| 5 |
Univ. Calif., Davis |
1,104 |
+52 |
| 6 |
University of Minnesota |
648 |
+46 |
| 7 |
Pennsylvania State University |
609 |
+38 |
| 8 |
Washington State University |
539 |
+26 |
| 9 |
University of Nebraska |
592 |
+24 |
10
 |
Univ. Illinois, Urbana |
674 |
+19 |
|
Agricultural
Sciences
³300 Papers |

| Rank |
Institution |
#
of
Papers |
Relative
Impact (%) |
|
| 1 |
Univ. Calif., Berkeley |
987 |
+129 |
| 2 |
University of Arizona |
721 |
+123 |
| 3 |
Duke University |
560 |
+115 |
| 4 |
Yale University |
377 |
+115 |
| 5 |
Univ. Calif., Santa Barbara |
357 |
+114 |
| 6 |
Univ. Calif., San Diego |
612 |
+113 |
| 7 |
Woods Hole Ocean. Inst. |
588 |
+90 |
| 8 |
Harvard University |
674 |
+80 |
| 9 |
Indiana University |
345 |
+66 |
10
 |
University of Missouri |
1,134 |
+59 |
|
Plant
&
Animal
Science
³300 Papers |

| Rank |
Institution |
#
of
Papers |
Relative
Impact (%) |
|
| 1 |
Stanford University |
604 |
+90 |
| 2 |
Yale University |
552 |
+83 |
| 3 |
University of Chicago |
312 |
+60 |
| 4 |
Washington University |
595 |
+56 |
| 5 |
Harvard University |
2,131 |
+51 |
| 6 |
Univ. Calif., San Francisco |
923 |
+47 |
| 7 |
University of Iowa |
340 |
+46 |
| 8 |
New York University |
360 |
+44 |
| 9 |
Univ. Calif., San Diego |
430 |
+37 |
10
 |
University of Washington |
852 |
+36 |
|
Immunology
³300 Papers |

| Rank |
Institution |
#
of
Papers |
Relative
Impact (%) |
|
| 1 |
Univ. Calif., Santa Barbara |
399 |
+113 |
| 2 |
Stanford University |
457 |
+95 |
| 3 |
Univ. Wisconsin, Madison |
712 |
+85 |
| 4 |
Harvard University |
536 |
+80 |
| 5 |
University of Washington |
682 |
+76 |
| 6 |
Arizona State University |
355 |
+72 |
| 7 |
U. North Carolina, Chapel Hill |
322 |
+67 |
| 8 |
Michigan State University |
557 |
+65 |
| 9 |
Univ. Calif., Berkeley |
996 |
+59 |
10
 |
Duke University |
554 |
+57 |
|
Ecology/
Environment
³300 Papers |

| Rank |
Institution |
#
of
Papers |
Relative
Impact (%) |
|
| 1 |
MIT |
665 |
+184 |
| 2 |
Rockefeller University |
517 |
+100 |
| 3 |
Harvard University |
3,277 |
+80 |
| 4 |
Univ. Calif., San Diego |
1,061 |
+76 |
| 5 |
Yale University |
1,034 |
+75 |
| 6 |
Univ. Calif., San Francisco |
1,238 |
+73 |
| 7 |
Columbia University |
962 |
+64 |
| 8 |
Univ. Texas Southwestern Med. Ctr., Dallas |
660 |
+64 |
| 9 |
Stanford University |
1,178 |
+62 |
10
 |
Univ. Calif., Berkeley |
886 |
+60 |
|
Molecular
Biology &
Genetics
³500 Papers |

| Rank |
Institution |
#
of
Papers |
Relative
Impact (%) |
|
| 1 |
Vanderbilt University |
356 |
+124 |
| 2 |
Univ. Calif., San Diego |
225 |
+118 |
| 3 |
University of Pennsylvania |
244 |
+84 |
| 4 |
Columbia University |
200 |
+80 |
| 5 |
Univ. Calif., San Francisco |
377 |
+80 |
| 6 |
U. North Carolina, Chapel Hill |
629 |
+70 |
| 7 |
University of Washington |
469 |
+69 |
| 8 |
University of Colorado |
281 |
+61 |
| 9 |
Indiana University |
223 |
+61 |
10
 |
Johns Hopkins University |
377 |
+59 |
|
Pharmacology
³200 Papers |

| Rank |
Institution |
#
of
Papers |
Relative
Impact (%) |
|
| 1 |
Univ. Texas Southwestern Med. Ctr., Dallas |
1,311 |
+92 |
| 2 |
Harvard University |
4,562 |
+78 |
| 3 |
Univ. Southern California |
842 |
+73 |
| 4 |
University of Virginia |
1,068 |
+72 |
| 5 |
Yeshiva University |
897 |
+71 |
| 6 |
Washington University |
1,671 |
+68 |
| 7 |
Oregon Health &
Sci. Univ. |
727 |
+63 |
| 8 |
Stanford University |
1,645 |
+63 |
| 9 |
Duke University |
1,508 |
+59 |
10
 |
Univ. Calif., San Francisco |
1,846 |
+58 |
|
Biology
&
Biochemistry
³500 Papers |
Top
Science
Watch®, November/December 2006, Vol. 17, No. 6
Citing URL: http://www.sciencewatch.com/nov-dec2006/sw_nov-dec2006_page1.htm |
|