Just over two years ago a letter for publication arrived at our editorial office of The Lancet in London, and I well remember the surprise it caused among the editorial team, none of whom would have ever done a coronary-artery bypass procedure. We were probably being naive, but the notion that you could do coronary-artery grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass (i.e., while the heart was beating), and via a smallish incision rather than the crude sternum-splitting route, seemed almost miraculous. That letter, by R.D. Stanbridge and colleagues, was published in September, 1995 (The Lancet, 346[8978]:837, 1995). Four months later, at a meeting in Orlando, Florida, Antonio M. Calafiore's group in Chieti, Italy, presented their experience with 155 cases, a series that had started in November, 1994. As the discussion following this paper (#5) shows, several groups had in fact tried this approach or something similar, and the true pioneer seems to be Valavanur A. Subramanian of Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City. The surgeons here are not displaying superb technique for its own sake. Cardiopulmonary bypass itself has problems, and the traditional sternotomy route leaves a very sore patient. The Chieti group had their patients out of intensive care in four hours or so (range 1-23) and, with the one death and seven reoperations excluded, the postoperative stay averaged just 53 hours. 77% of patients were discharged from hospital on the second day. Those are extraordinary figures. At follow-up, to six months, 92% of patients were "alive and free of symptoms without a cardiac event." A criticism of some minimal access or minimally invasive surgical procedures (the lay term is "keyhole," but clinicians, rightly, resist that word, and it is certainly inappropriate here) is that they may be adopted too widely and too quickly without full evaluation or complete training. Subramanian was concerned about this, and focused on the need to immobilize the coronary artery. His group was looking at two ideas, neither, of course, involving bypassnamely, a mechanical stabilization platform and pharmacological maneuvers to stop the heart very briefly. We are going to hear more of this procedure. What will it be called? The traditional operation of coronary artery bypass grafting is known as CABG (pronounced "cabbage"). This procedure grafts a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) via a left anterior small thoracotomy (LAST) but only by implication does LIMA-LAST carry the flavor of a bypass-free operation.
Farther down the list, two papers report
investigations of the hepatitis agent known as hepatitis GB virus C (GBV-C). This agent is
one of a family of GB viruses, so named after being isolated in 1967 from a hepatitis
patient whose initials were G.B. In paper #6, a trio of Japanese researchers investigated
the possible role of GBV-C in cases of non-A-E hepatitis (that is, not caused by the known
viruses A through E). Examining serum from six patients afflicted with fulminant hepatitis
of unknown viral origin, the team found evidence of the GBV-C virus genome in three of the
cases. They conclude that this agent appears to be important in the etiology of non-A-E
hepatitis. In a more recent study (#9), another Japanese team notes an increased risk of
GBV-C infection to patients on maintenance hemodialysis.
|
Mr
David W. Sharp, M.A. (Cambridge),
is a Deputy Editor of The Lancet, London, U.K.
| Science
Watch®, November/December 1997, Vol. 8, No. 6 Citing URL: http://www.sciencewatch.com/nov-dec97/sw_nov-dec97_page5.htm |
Search | November/December 1997 Index | Archives | Contact | Home
|
|
|
|
|
Science
Watch® is an editorial component of Essential
Science Indicators |
|
|
|
(c) 2008 The
Thomson Corporation. |