It is not easy to persuade the general public (or indeed some physicians) that if there is a "fault" in obesity it lies at a metabolic, even genetic level and not in the character of those afflicted. If only the science was more straightforward. For example, the leptin story remains exciting both scientifically and in citation terms, and the paper highlighted in Science Watch two issues ago (8[3]:5, May/June 1997) is still on top this time (paper #1). Yet, apart from one familial case (see Nature, 387:903, 1997), mutations in the leptin gene remain elusive. Does the same disappointment await a missense mutation in the gene for the ß3-adrenergic receptor? This receptor in adipose tissue threads in and out of the cell several times, leaving three loops on the outside and three intracellular loops within. At position 64, at the beginning of the first intracellular loop, lies a mutation site (cytosine to thymidine) known as Trp64Arg. (Catecholamines, which adrenoreceptors are built to trap, have a role in lipolysis.) This mutation was the subject of three papers in the August 10, 1995, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine (333[6]). The article by Elisabeth Widn and her colleagues from Sweden and Finland reaches the Top Ten this time (see paper #9); one other is by Jeremy Walston, of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, and colleagues (pp. 343-7, #12, with 18 citations logged during May-June 1997); Karine Clment and colleagues, representing institutions in France and the United States, also have a "hot paper" that is not yet warm enough for e very top (pp. 352-4, with 15 citations for the period). In the Clément study the mutation was found in only 14 of 185 obese people in France, and the allele frequencies were unremarkable at 0.08 (obese) and 0.10 (normal). Paper #12 is only indirectly about obesity, being a study of the diabetes-prone Pima Indians in the United States. The allele frequency was 0.31 and in the control groups it was around the 0.10 recorded in France. The impact of Trp64Arg was on the age of onset of non-insulin-dependent diabetes rather than on the risk of diabetes itself. In Bothnia, Finland (paper #9), and in the Pima, the frequency of the mutation was much the same in the diabetic as in the non-diabetic; the age of diabetes onset was lower, by five years, in the Pima Indians with Trp64Arg. Johan Auwerx, of the Institut Pasteur de Lille, France, commented previously for Science Watch on the leptin paper at #1, so we went back to him about the ß3 adrenoreceptor point mutation. He notes subsequent reports that have "failed to confirm the claims of the three NEJM papers," citing two reports in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism from 1996 (81:4422-7; and 82:1284-7). "I would be very careful in interpreting results on the ß3 adreno-receptor," Auwerx tells Science Watch. "Although undoubtedly important in the animal situation, good evidence for its importance in man is at best controversial at present." There are significant increases in indicators of insulin resistance in the Finnish data, and Widn et al. speculate that premature cardiovascular mortality associated with this resistance explains why the expected difference in Trp64Arg allele frequency has not been found. Auwerx thinks that the genes for the ß3 adrenoreceptor and for
leptin do have a role in body-weight homeostasis but "it is too early to tell their
relative importance vis-à-vis other players, including neuropeptide Y, sex steroids,
glucocorticoids, and thyroid hormone." These two examples, he adds, "are a
warning of the dangers of extrapolating from animal models, where obesity is largely
monogenic, to human obesity, a polygenic disorder strongly influenced by environmental
factors such as diet and exercise."
|
Mr.
David W. Sharp, M.A. (Cambridge),
is a Deputy Editor of The Lancet, London, U.K.
| Science
Watch®, September/October 1997, Vol. 8, No. 5 Citing URL: http://www.sciencewatch.com/sept-oct97/sw_sep-oct97_page5.htm |
Search | September/October 1997 Index | Archives | Contact | Home
|
|
|
|
|
Science
Watch® is an editorial component of Essential
Science Indicators |
|
|
|
(c) 2008 The
Thomson Corporation. |